|
6/3/03
Recreational fishermen around Northern California were saddened
to learn that Captain Jim Casey, who operated the charter boat
Patty-C out of Noyo Harbor for many years, passed away on May
20th. He was a real gent.
I had spoken to him at length only a few weeks ago down at the
Rumblefish dock, where he used to help out. When I mentioned
CENCAL, a coalition of diving clubs, he mentioned that he had
been a member back in the early 50s, in the days before neoprene,
and when divers often braved the chilly Northern Californian
ocean in little more than bathing suits.
Jim Casey pioneered light tackle rockfishing here on the north
coast, and made these killer diamond-shaped jigs that were very
effective on ling cod. Soft-spoken and seen-everything, Jim was
a treasure who will be sorely missed in the harbor.
Despite the flat-calm seas this Memorial Day weekend, and hundreds
of private boats scouring the region for salmon, it was reported
to have been a very slow bite. Sunday, only two fish had been
counted by the fish count lady at the public ramp at Noyo.
You may have read about that news report concerning a "90%
decline in large offshore fish populations" - if you didn't
hear about it, you must be living under a rock. The first thing
to realize about this study, which was first announced in Nature
magazine, is that when you hear a single story, with a single
message, broadcast internationally in print, radio, and TV, there's
a well-oiled publicity machine behind it working overtime to
spin the story in a certain direction - in this case, to promote
the implementation of large no-fishing zones in coastal waters.
I was able to locate the original study, by Ransom A Myers &
Boris Worm, in the May edition of Nature. They analyzed data
from the Japanese pelagic longline fleet going back to the 50s.
It's appalling data indeed. Pelagic predators in the open ocean,
species like bluefin tuna, swordfish, and marlin, have been reduced
to 10% of their unfished levels by seafood gourmets. "Industrialized
fisheries typically reduced community biomass by 80% in 15 years
of exploitation." "Pelagic longlines are the most widespread
fishing gear, and the Japanese fleet the most widespread longline
operation, covering all oceans except the circumpolar seas."
(It's therefore not surprising that a US submarine, surfacing
in the middle of the Pacific, hit a Japanese longliner in the
middle of nowhere.) Myers & Worm commented on the way this
fishery acts as a very efficient data collection system, not
to mention fish collection system. "Longlines, which resemble
long, baited transects, catch a wide range of species in a consistent
way over vast spatial scales." Translation: Japanese longlines
catch nearly everything, all the time, everywhere. What they
don't catch is swept up along the bottom by trawlers. It's truly
mind-boggling, the geographic spread of the longline fleet's
activity, which is shown in global maps in the Myers & Worm
paper.
The key word here is "industrialized" fishing. It's
not the commercial salmon day boats, nor the weekend warrior
sportfisherman, who has wreaked this environmental havoc. One
of the major points of the study is that removing so many top
predators from the ecosystem has unknown effects on entire pelagic
communities.
Marine Reserves may be an answer, but the trend is for the no-fishing
zones to be placed in coastal zones, where the impact is greatest
on the public access to public trust resources. Closing areas
in California state waters, or even within the 200-mile Exclusive
Economic Zone managed by sovereign nations, will have zero impact
on offshore longlining.
To sum up: sushi-buying is politically incorrect and money is
no object to the enviro foundations when cranking up their publicity
machine for marine reserves, and the reach of their bullhorn
is global. Coastal zone marine reserves will not address problems
with offshore species and longlining.
Bruce Jacoby, of the Boston Globe, wrote an op-ed piece a few
weeks back, titled, "Is Catch and Release Fishing Inhumane?"
It was a typical bash on sportfishing. I tend to agree that C&R
fishing is weird, and even cruel, but I am biased because I fish
for food and fun with friends. Yet fishes do not have the brain
pan, nor the neurological receptors, to experience what humans
call "pain." (The anthropomorphism within the envirowhacko
community is a whole 'nother subject I could rant about for hours.)
A better question for Jacoby would have been: "Are Seafood
Buyers Inhumane?" What about the Japanese buying marlin
- MARLIN! - for catfood? Pacific "red snapper" - a
marketing term for the entire complex of deep-water sebastes
rockfish - sells cheap in any supermarket here in the US, even
as the data shows that the populations cannot sustain industrial
exploitation from bottom-dragging trawls. Our fisheries are managed
in-house by commercial interests through regional councils. The
fox is in charge of the hen coop.
|